Monday, November 28, 2011

Myth of Steve Jobs

In the age of push-button publishing and social networking, people


seem to have become de-humanised, not knowing what their true

emotions are. This became very clear recently in the wake of Apple

co-founder Steve Jobs’ demise. Tributes ranged from “hagiographic”

to “outright lame.” Nobody seemed to have put an effort. There was

no honesty nor any genuine feeling.




Dennis Ritchie, the inventor of the C language and co-inventor of

the Unix operating system, died a few days after Steve Jobs. He was

far more influential than Jobs. There was hardly a mention anywhere.



US President Obama led the pack: “Steve was among the greatest of

American innovators.” Really, what did Steve invent? Steven

Spielberg went further: “Steve Jobs was the greatest inventor since

Thomas Edison. He put the world at our fingertips.” That would have

set the man who invented light bulb incandescent with rage! Closer

home, in India, HCL owner Shiv Nadar said, “He is in the same league

as the person who created the wheel.”



After tech luminaries, politicians, and celebrities set the ball

rolling, technically challenged daily news publications in America

took over with individual pieces on what they thought Steve Jobs and

Apple had accomplished. That was when the lines got blurred. There

was one blooper after another. And, it wouldn’t stop there. When

FOSS guru Richard Stallman refused to follow the herd and tried to

put things in proper perspective, the defenders of the ark went

really out of hand (Forbes; Leave It To Richard Stallman To Go

There; 10 October, 2011).



Myth 1: Steve Jobs Invented The Personal Computer



Even The New York Times fell for this urban legend. (What Makes Steve

Jobs Great; http://is.gd/s19pR1). In 1973, Xerox Corporation had something called a “personal workstation.” It was a research project limited Xerox installations and

a few universities. It could not be used at home.



So, the job of inventing the personal computer was left to a guy named

Gary Kildall. Not even Intel knew their processors could be used on a

desktop. If you check the archives of the American TV program

“Computer Chronicles”, you will find an episode titled “Gary Kildall

Special” (http://youtu.be/VipwFeJ1KMU) that will make it clear as

daylight as to who invented the PC.



… Killdall had started developing his Control Program for

Microcomputers (CP/M) in the early 1970s when he realized the

potential for a general-purpose small computer. He was carrying a

portable computer at a time when a desktop PC was just a dream.



Tom Rolander (first DRI employee): “I met Gary in 1973 in the

Computer Science Lab late one evening. He was a young kid … He came

into the computer center with a leather briefcase that he flipped

open that he connected to a teletype … and that was an entire

self-contained computer. It was the first personal computer I ever saw.”



… Gordon Eubanks (another DRI employee, later Symantec): “… he

invented a programming language called PL/M and implemented it for

the Intel microprocessors to prove that that 8080 was a real

computer and not a controller for microwave ovens …



… while a consultant at Intel in the 70s, he offered to sell them

CP/M but Intel could see no use for it and turned him down. Shortly

afterwards in 1976, Gary and his wife Dorothy founded a company

called InterGalactic Digital Research, later shortened to Digital

Research …



Gary’s design allowed programs written for CP/M to be used on hardware

produced by different manufacturers. Thus, CP/M started a whole new

industry for personal computing.



In 1977, Steve Jobs started marketing a “personal computer” DESIGNED

BY STEVE WOZNIAK. Their Apple II personal computer was targeted at the

masses, unlike CP/M-loaded PC kits targeted at hobbyists and engineers.

Apple II was one of several commercially successful personal computers.



Myth 2: Steve Jobs and Apple Pioneered The Graphical User Interface (GUI)



In 1975, Xerox invented the GUI or the WIMP - windows, icons, menus and

a pointer controlled by hand-held device known as the mouse. (Xerox PARC

History; http://is.gd/r2EPKj)



Apple’s attempt at GUI was called Lisa and was released in 1983. Because

of his running feud with the Apple management, Steve Jobs was forced out

of the Lisa project. Later, Jobs got interested in the “Macintosh”

project run by an Apple employee named Jeff Raskin. Jobs forced out

Raskin and took over the project. He also visited Xerox Palo Alto

Research Center and studied their GUI implementation. He also brought in

people from Xerox to work on the Macintosh project. Apple did make

several improvements to the Xerox GUI concept. To put it correctly, the

Mac was the first commercially successful OS that featured a GUI.



Myth 3: Without Steve Jobs, Beautiful Typefaces Wouldn’t Have Come To

Computers



This myth was propagated by Steve Jobs himself. It is like saying that

if Columbus hadn’t discovered America, then the continent would have

remained undiscovered. In 2005, Steve Jobs made this claim in the

“commencement address” he gave at Stanford University.



…Reed College at that time offered perhaps the best calligraphy

instruction in the country. Throughout the campus every poster,

every label on every drawer, was beautifully hand calligraphed.

Because I had dropped out and didn’t have to take the normal

classes, I decided to take a calligraphy class to learn how to do

this. I learned about serif and san serif typefaces, about varying

the amount of space between different letter combinations, about

what makes great typography great. It was beautiful, historical,

artistically subtle in a way that science can’t capture, and I found

it fascinating.



None of this had even a hope of any practical application in my

life. But ten years later, when we were designing the first

Macintosh computer, it all came back to me. And we designed it all

into the Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful typography.

If I had never dropped in on that single course in college, the Mac

would have never had multiple typefaces or proportionally spaced

fonts. And since Windows just copied the Mac, it’s likely that no

personal computer would have them. If I had never dropped out, I

would have never dropped in on this calligraphy class, and personal

computers might not have the wonderful typography that they do….



Myth 4: Steve Jobs And His Original Ideas



The Mac OS X was based on the NeXTStep operating system built by Steve

Jobs’ company NeXT Computer. NeXTStep was one of many Unix-like

operating systems and used BSD Unix source code.



Despite the fact Apple owed so much to open source, it did not prevent

Steve Jobs from trying to discourage companies supporting open source.

In 2010, *Jonathan Schwartz*, former CEO of Sun Microsystems, recounted

his encounter with Steve Jobs in a blog post titled “Good Artists Copy,

Great Artists Steal” (http://is.gd/oAK6Vd):



…I feel for Google. Steve Jobs threatened to sue me, too. In 2003,

after I unveiled a prototype Linux desktop called Project Looking

Glass, Steve called my office to let me know the graphical effects

were “stepping all over Apple IP. (IP = Intellectual Property =

patents, trademarks and copyrights.) If we moved forward to

commercialize it, “I’ll just sue you.” My response was simple.

“Steve, I was just watching your last presentation, and Keynote

looks identical to Concurrence. “Do you own that IP?” Concurrence

was a presentation product built by Lighthouse Design, a company I

help to found and which Sun acquired in 1996. Lighthouse built

applications for NeXTSTEP, the Unix based operating system whose

core would become the foundation for all Mac products after Apple

acquired NeXT in 1996. Steve had used Concurrence for years, and as

Apple built their own presentation tool, it was obvious where they’d

found inspiration. And last I checked, MacOS is now built on Unix. I

think Sun has a few OS patents, too. Steve was silent. And that was

the last I heard on the topic….



These were not the only instances when Apple relied on others’ work. The

Safari browser created by Apple uses an HTML rendering engine called

Webkit. Webkit was derived from the KHTML engine used by the open-source

Konqueror browser. Many Apple devices such as the iPod uses an open

source font-rendering engine known as FreeType. This is particularly

galling considering that FreeType developers struggled for many years

without a proper specification for the bytecode interpreter logic for

TrueType fonts. Although FreeType developers

(http://www.freetype.org/freetype2) eventually succeeded in reverse

engineering this Apple secret, patent-conscious FreeType users had to

wait till May 2010 when Apple patents on hinting bytecode expired

(FreeType and Patents; http://is.gd/Zb7um5).



Myth 5: Steve Jobs Was A Design Genius



Steve Jobs was not a designer. Most successful Apple designs were

created by somebody else at Apple, not Steve Jobs. He approved or

disapproved designs. Apple’s chief designer Johnathan Ive said to Jobs’

biographer:



“He [Jobs] will go through a process of looking at my ideas and say,

‘That’s no good.’ ‘That’s not very good.’ ‘I like that one.’ And

later I will be sitting in the audience and he will be talking about

it as if it was his idea.” [CNET; Jonathan Ive: Steve Jobs stole my

ideas; http://is.gd/9z895W]



The Apple iPod was based on a design invented and patented (US Patent

6928433; http://is.gd/QURqJd) by Creative, the Singapore company of

Soundblaster soundcard fame. The suit filed by Creative against Apple

shows some glimpses on how the genius worked:



The complaint accuses Apple Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs of

getting a look at the design details when he tried to arrange a

joint business partnership with Creative Technology. But Apple then

“abruptly” changed course and tried to license its technology. Apple

also suggested that Creative Technology spin off its digital music

player arm into a separate company, allowing Apple to invest in it.

When Creative Technology refused, Apple went ahead and introduced

the iPod in 2001. [San Francisco Chronicle; Lawsuit: iPod violates

patent / Rival alleges Apple took player’s design after being

spurned; http://is.gd/9OgLNs]



The first generation Apple iPods were not the epitome of design. It took

three more generations to get them to look pretty. The first generation

of Apple iPhones did not have the ability to forward text messages. They

also did not have the ability to do cut and paste text. It is all

forgotten now. Apple mobile devices cannot really be switched off. The

screen would go dark but internally the device would remain on and

consume power from the battery. This design choice allowed the user to

pick up the device and start using it right away. No other company would

be allowed to have such liberties. To make matters worse, these devices

did not come with a user-replaceable battery. It could be replaced only

at an enormous cost to the user.



In conclusion, we may never really know why why these myths were

created. Perhaps, some big shots saw a potential gold mine and pumped up

the man, the company and its products to high heavens. If true, their

efforts must have been rewarded beyond their wildest dreams - the market

capitalization of Apple (a company that sells overpriced gadgets) stands

cheek by jowl with Exxon (the world’s biggest oil company on whose

products runs the world’s biggest economy). We may never know. What is

really within our realm is understanding why these myths found traction.

It must be the “Mona Lisa Effect”. The original is pretty much

unremarkable. The literature surrounding it paints a different picture.

We did not accept what our eyes told us - that IT WAS AN ORDINARY

PAINTING. Under the influence of the propaganda, we started believing

that the painting was greater than it really was. The same thing seems

to have happened in Steve Jobs’ case. Steve Jobs’ real achievement (that

nobody mentioned) was that he stood up to Bill Gates (after numerous

falls though). As the Bill Gates road-kill list is too long to be

mentioned here, I suggest the reader go over a few articles by on

RoughlyDrafted.com (Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office

Monopoly, http://is.gd/LHIAMH) to get a full picture of what shaped

Steve’s attitude towards competition.



(V. Subhash)



No comments: